[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600768: marked as done (unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1)



Your message dated Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:21:10 +0200
with message-id <4CC14976.7090405@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600768: unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600768,
regarding unblock: totem-pl-parser/2.30.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600768: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600768
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Hi,

please unblock totem-pl-parser. It fixes a pair of bugs.

totem-pl-parser (2.30.3-1) unstable; urgency=low

  * New upstream bugfix release.

Upstream changes:
* Fix parsing of M3U files with ":" in their titles 
* Fix parsing of files hiding as MP4 files (eg. an FLV with an MP4 extension)


Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.      Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'  “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone,
  `-    […] I will see what I can do for you.”  -- Jörg Schilling

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/20/2010 01:31 AM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: freeze-exception
> 
> Hi,
> 
> please unblock totem-pl-parser. It fixes a pair of bugs.
> 

Unblocked.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/


--- End Message ---

Reply to: