[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600366: marked as done (nmu: sawfish_1:1.5.3-2)



Your message dated Thu, 21 Oct 2010 15:45:21 +0200
with message-id <20101021134521.GF21708@patate.is-a-geek.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600366: nmu: sawfish_1:1.5.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600366,
regarding nmu: sawfish_1:1.5.3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600366: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600366
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu sawfish_1:1.5.3-2 . ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Rebuild with librep-dev 0.90.2-1.1"

I checked for other reverse dependencies of librep-dev, and found
sawfish is failing on three architectures with very similar errors to
rep-gtk:

https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=sawfish

So please can we try binNMUs on those arches?

(Oh wait, this is #599959.)

Thanks,

Tim

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 17:46:01 +0100, Tim Retout wrote:

> Well, if someone could take that lot and make some sense out of it, I'll
> go and lie down in a darkened room...
> 
Given back with the new librep, should be sorted out shortly.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply to: