Le mardi 19 octobre 2010 à 20:13 +0100, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:29 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 08:12 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > Does that mean libproxy will depend (as in Depends control field) on > > > webkit ? That's going to be a problem later, because iceweasel 4.0 may use > > > libproxy (I enabled it, but I'm not entirely sure I'll keep it that way). > > > > No. It doesn’t depend on libmozjs either, it uses whatever is available > > on the system if it has been built against it. > > 0.3.1-2 does have a Recommends on libwebkit | libmozjs, however. Yes, it’s intentional. Do you think it is a problem? The primary issue I see with this change it that it doesn’t handle binNMUs correctly. Note that I intend to work with libsoup upstreams to get rid of libproxy for squeeze+1. I’d recommend against iceweasel using libproxy directly. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “If you behave this way because you are blackmailed by someone, `- […] I will see what I can do for you.” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part