[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600623: marked as done (unblock: jinja2/2.5.5-1)

Your message dated Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:06:09 +0200
with message-id <4CBD4361.4080302@dogguy.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600623: unblock: jinja2/2.5.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600623,
regarding unblock: jinja2/2.5.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600623: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600623
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception

Please unblock package jinja2

fixes two important bugs, quote from upstream changelog:
- Fixed extensions not loading properly with overlays.
- Work around a bug in cpython for the debugger that causes segfaults
  on 64bit big-endian architectures.
- fixed an operator precedence error introduced in 2.5.2.  Statements
  like "-foo.bar" had their implicit parentheses applied around the
  first part of the expression ("(-foo).bar") instead of the more
  correct "-(foo.bar)".

from tests:
|    def test_parse_unary(self):
|        tmpl = env.from_string('{{ -foo["bar"] }}')
|        assert tmpl.render(foo={'bar': 42}) == '-42'
|        tmpl = env.from_string('{{ -foo["bar"]|abs }}')
|        assert tmpl.render(foo={'bar': 42}) == '42'

the fix is very small, hint: filter out html docs from debdiff, upstream
removed them in 2.5.5 (I asked to not re-release the same version with
different tarball), I can upload 2.5.5-1 if you prefer

unblock jinja2/2.5.4-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 10/19/2010 08:47 AM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> retitle 600623 unblock: jinja2/2.5.5-1
> thanks
> 
> [Mehdi Dogguy, 2010-10-19]
>> On 10/18/2010 07:48 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: 
>>> release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception
>>>
>>> Please unblock package jinja2
>>>
>>
>> There is a "_build" directory in the tarball. I assume that its content
>> is completely generated (please correct me if I'm wrong). What's the
>> reason of having it in the source package? (except making the diff much
>> bigger).
> 
> ok, I uploaded 2.5.5 (the one without html files in upstream tarball),

Thanks! I unblocked 2.5.5-1.

Regards,

-- 
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

--- End Message ---
Reply to: