[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#600317: marked as done (nmu: rep-gtk_1:0.90.0-2+b1)



Your message dated Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:42:34 +0100
with message-id <1852b8dfa635d1ceb4d8834f8b57a942.squirrel@adsl.funkybadger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#600317: nmu: rep-gtk_1:0.90.0-2+b1
has caused the Debian Bug report #600317,
regarding nmu: rep-gtk_1:0.90.0-2+b1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
600317: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600317
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

See the package sizes on: http://packages.debian.org/sid/rep-gtk - now
that librep-dev 0.90.2-1.1 is installed, rep-gtk should be rebuilt on
kfreebsd-amd64.

nmu rep-gtk_1:0.90.0-2+b1 . kfreebsd-amd64 . -m "Build against librep-dev 0.90.2-1.1"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, October 15, 2010 23:53, Tim Retout wrote:
> See the package sizes on: http://packages.debian.org/sid/rep-gtk - now
> that librep-dev 0.90.2-1.1 is installed, rep-gtk should be rebuilt on
> kfreebsd-amd64.
>
> nmu rep-gtk_1:0.90.0-2+b1 . kfreebsd-amd64 . -m "Build against librep-dev
> 0.90.2-1.1"

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: