Your message dated Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:29:31 +0200 with message-id <4CADAF1B.8020209@dogguy.org> and subject line Re: Bug#599397: future unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-5 has caused the Debian Bug report #599397, regarding future unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 599397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599397 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: future unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-5
- From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:02:16 +0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20101007090049.10654.99247.reportbug@greylight.outland.hoster.bg>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package dma Sorry to bother you again about the same package, but I just noticed that it FTBFS on GNU/Hurd, and that this can be fixed with a trivial two-line patch. Is this reason enough for a freeze exception? Here's the diffstat for the not-yet-uploaded -5 - it adds a quilt patch adding an #ifdef/#endif pair of lines. This is a no-op on all the architectures actually supported by Squeeze, so it will do no harm - but, yes, it will have no real effect on Squeeze either, so I'll take "no" for an answer :) G'luck, Peter unblock dma/0.0.2010.06.17-5 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bashdiffstat for dma-0.0.2010.06.17-5 changelog | 6 ++++++ patches/36-sa_nocldwait.patch | 17 +++++++++++++++++ patches/series | 1 + 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+) diff -Nru dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/changelog dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/changelog --- dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/changelog 2010-10-06 17:30:31.000000000 +0300 +++ dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/changelog 2010-10-07 11:42:24.000000000 +0300 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +dma (0.0.2010.06.17-5) unstable; urgency=low + + * Only use SA_NOCLDWAIT if available to fix the Hurd FTBFS. + + -- Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:42:23 +0300 + dma (0.0.2010.06.17-4) unstable; urgency=low * Fix an infinite loop in dma-migrate if char is unsigned. diff -Nru dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/36-sa_nocldwait.patch dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/36-sa_nocldwait.patch --- dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/36-sa_nocldwait.patch 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200 +++ dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/36-sa_nocldwait.patch 2010-10-07 11:40:52.000000000 +0300 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +Description: Do not use SA_NOCLDWAIT on platforms like the GNU Hurd. +Forwarded: http://gitorious.org/dma/dma/merge_requests/1 +Author: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> +Last-Update: 2010-10-07 + +--- a/dma.c ++++ b/dma.c +@@ -218,7 +218,9 @@ + daemonize = 0; + + bzero(&sa, sizeof(sa)); ++#ifdef SA_NOCLDWAIT + sa.sa_flags = SA_NOCLDWAIT; ++#endif + sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN; + sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, NULL); + diff -Nru dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/series dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/series --- dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/series 2010-06-28 17:10:32.000000000 +0300 +++ dma-0.0.2010.06.17/debian/patches/series 2010-10-07 11:18:28.000000000 +0300 @@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ 33-opportunistic-tls.patch 34-manpage-defaults.patch 35-delivery-retry.patch +36-sa_nocldwait.patchAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, 599397-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#599397: future unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-5
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 13:29:31 +0200
- Message-id: <4CADAF1B.8020209@dogguy.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20101007090049.10654.99247.reportbug@greylight.outland.hoster.bg>
- References: <[🔎] 20101007090049.10654.99247.reportbug@greylight.outland.hoster.bg>
On 07/10/2010 11:02, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: freeze-exception > > Please unblock package dma > Unblocked. Regards, -- Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي http://dogguy.org/
--- End Message ---