On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 05:10:29PM +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > ----- "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 15:58 +1000, Nathan Scott wrote: > > > ----- "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > > > The corresponding changes to debian/control, debian/source/*, > > debian/compat and debian/rules have all been reverted. > > The changes that were correct and agreed to *have been merged*, > as I said - one or two were incorrect, not reviewed and (Anibal > will agree I'm sure) shouldn't have been patched in. I agree. This was discussed in the upstream mailing list a month (or so) ago. > Do you have any actual functional regression you see here, or > are we just arguing for the sake of it at this point? There's > plenty of other sheds in need of painting... > > cheers. > > -- > Nathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature