Bug#597119: Proposed new ffado package
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 19:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> The Breaks / Replaces on ffado-python-support aren't strictly necessary
> as the package only existed for a few days, and then only in unstable;
> I'm not going to object if you wish to leave them in, however.
I see -3 has now been uploaded with them in; I'd still be interested in
an answer to this query:
> I assume the cdbs build-dependency bump is related to the changes in
> debian/rules? Specifically these:
>
> -include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk
>
> -DEB_BUILD_ARCH ?= $(shell dpkg-architecture -qDEB_BUILD_ARCH)
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: