[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#598148: marked as done (unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.10)

Your message dated Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:29:52 +0200
with message-id <20100928232952.GW10564@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#598148: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.10
has caused the Debian Bug report #598148,
regarding unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.10
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
598148: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598148
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Subject: unblock: nss-pam-ldapd/0.7.10
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Severity: normal

Sorry to bother you guys with yet another unblock request but can you
please unblock nss-pam-ldapd?

It fixes a problem (#596983) with the way some network problems are
handled. In some cases the nslcd daemon does not fail over correctly.

The change consists of two parts (in nslcd/myldap.c):
 - combine error handling for timeout, explicit error and unexpected
   result
 - disconnect on more error conditions (and automatically reconnect and
   fail-over if applicable)

I think the change is rather minimal and it passes all tests in my test
environment (including the new test that came up in #596983).

Thanks for considering (why do all these bugs show up during the
freeze).

-- 
-- arthur - adejong@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 22:53:09 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:

> Sorry to bother you guys with yet another unblock request but can you
> please unblock nss-pam-ldapd?
> 
Done.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: