On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:13:49 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2010-09-26 11:05, Julien Cristau wrote: > > I think it's just this one left: > > > > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 21:26:12 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > >> nvidia-graphics-modules 195.36.31+1 > >> > > So the prebuilt modules are only for the non-legacy version? > > That's were we started with. The infrastructure is there and we can > upload prebuilt legacy modules quite fast, but they will have to go > through NEW. Should we do this? I'm not sure whether we can get them > tested as good as the nvidia-graphics-modules 195.36.31+1. > OK, unblocked that one. I guess people can use dkms for the rest. > > What about nvidia-kernel-common? > > The changes in 20100522+2 compared to 20100522+1 are > > * housekeeping (++Standards-Version, ++debhelper compat, Uploaders, > VCS-*, ...) > * packaging simplification: use dpkg-maintscript-helper for renaming > config files instead of hand made code > > It would be nice to have this in squeeze, too. > Doesn't really sound like appropriate freeze-time changes. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature