Quoting Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org): > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 06:03:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > Quoting Archive Administrator (installer@ftp-master.debian.org): > > > > Reject Reasons: > > > samba-doc_3.4.9~dfsg-1_all.deb: old version (2:3.4.8~dfsg-2) in unstable <= new version (2:3.4.9~dfsg-1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. > > > samba-doc-pdf_3.4.9~dfsg-1_all.deb: old version (2:3.4.8~dfsg-2) in unstable <= new version (2:3.4.9~dfsg-1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. > > > samba-common_3.4.9~dfsg-1_all.deb: old version (2:3.4.8~dfsg-2) in unstable <= new version (2:3.4.9~dfsg-1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. > > > samba_3.4.9~dfsg-1.dsc: old version (2:3.4.8~dfsg-2) in unstable <= new version (2:3.4.9~dfsg-1) targeted at testing-proposed-updates. > > > I don't understand this. We don't have 3.4.8 in unstable. Anyone > > having a clue? > > $ dak ls -s unstable samba samba-doc > samba | 2:3.4.8~dfsg-2 | unstable | source, hurd-i386 > samba | 2:3.5.4~dfsg-2 | unstable | source, hppa, mips, mipsel, sparc > samba | 2:3.5.5~dfsg-1 | unstable | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, powerpc, s390 > samba-doc | 2:3.4.8~dfsg-2 | unstable | all > samba-doc | 2:3.5.4~dfsg-2 | unstable | all > samba-doc | 2:3.5.5~dfsg-1 | unstable | all > $ > > Bug in t-p-u; unstable reference-counts architecture: all packages now for > each individual port, so that unstable remains installable even when > architectures are out of sync, but this results in the t-p-u check failing > because of out-of-date packages in unstable. (Which pretty much defeats the > purpose of *using* t-p-u in about half the cases, so hopefully someone will > fix that on ftp-master before too long.) Hmmm, so indeed this check prevents us to fix samba in testing through t-p-u. Ftpmasters, is there something that can be done on your side?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature