[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#592900: Updating system-config-printer



On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 05:32:10AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 12.09.2010 21:38, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 18:39:00 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > 
> >> (reducing the cc: list since this is now release related)
> >> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 03:18:36PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 14:28:34 +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Since we don't have any file conflicts we simply let the autoremove
> >>>> handle the removal of python-cupsutils. Would this be an acceptable
> >>>> solution? If so I'd be happy to upload a new version.
> >>>
> >>> That sounds good to me.
> >> I've uploaded 1.2.3-2 to unstable. Please unblock.
> 
> Unfortunately, the lenny→squeeze upgrade is still broken.
> 
> See the bug [1] I filed against upgrade-reports, where I tried to upgrade a
> default lenny GNOME desktop.
> 
> As you can see from the sid upgrade log for apt-get [2], the
> system-config-printer-udev package is not automatically installed on upgrades
> and instead the old and useless hal-cups-utils package is kept.
> 
> > Investigating system-config-printer-udev
> > Package system-config-printer-udev has broken dep on hal-cups-utils
> >   Considering hal-cups-utils -1 as a solution to system-config-printer-udev -1
> >   Holding Back system-config-printer-udev rather than change hal-cups-utils
> 
> Most likely, because system-config-printer-udev is only recommended by
> system-config-printer and system-config-printer-udev Conflicts with hal-cups-utils.
> 
> If we want to get hal-cups-utils removed on upgrades, maybe the Conflicts should
> be moved to the system-config-printer package instead?
Maybe we should just depend on system-config-printer-udev (#595108)? I
can't check the upgrade path from here atm though.
 -- Guido


Reply to: