On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 07:44:51PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > If the RT > > wasn't ready to accept the consequences of such a big move, then maybe > > it wasn't a good idea to upload PHP 5.3.2? > > Please could you explain this comment? As above, PHP 5.3.2 has been in > unstable since March, and testing since April; that was the maintainers' > decision and not something that required the Release Team to be "ready > to accept the consequences". and before the first upload to unstable, 5.3 was in experimental for like 4 months, btw. i have no idea what the context here is though... sean
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature