On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:14:50 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote: > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 06:35:48PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Then can you help with the second part of my question? I still don't > > think I can review a 16k lines diff, or an iso. > > Well neither can I. I have no idea how to help you with a review. I can give > you details of the changes in the packaging, but I doubt this is what you're > looking for. Would it help to splt up the changes into different patches? But > the size will remain the same that way. > So for example you could strip out the translation stuff, or the solaris code, and whatever else is irrelevant. And provide a way to see what the changes to vbox-guest-additions are, other than 'Binary file changed', which is not overly helpful. > I trust upstream that they know there code and I really think we should add bug > fixes for squeeze if we can. Again, if there was a new feature in there I > wouldn't even ask. Here's what they say: > I don't trust anybody to write 16kloc without bugs. > Oracle today released VirtualBox 3.2.8, a maintenance release of VirtualBox 3.2 > which improves stability and fixes regressions. See the ChangeLog for details. > I'm not sure what that means. Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature