On Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:10:03 -0300, "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <faw@funlabs.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi Kan-Ru Chen, > > On 29-08-2010 23:46, Kan-Ru Chen wrote: > > I'd like to upload a new upstream release that should fixes two FTBFS > > and one correctness bug: #590263, #590264, and #590245, respectively. > > > > In fact due to the bugs mentioned above, mupdf is not in testing > > yet. Would it be acceptable to add new packages to testing like this? If > > not, should I update the package in unstable and wait until squeeze > > is released? (hopefully it wouldn't take too long :) > > As you noticed, mupdf is not in testing. It is also a fairly new > package in Debian and a new upstream version would mean that it > is even less tested. > > Unless you have a stronger reason to unfreeze mupdf, I'm sorry > to say but we will release Squeeze without mupdf. > Thanks, I think so, too. Let it stay unstable for now. Regards, Kanru
Attachment:
pgpoYIhXZLtvA.pgp
Description: PGP signature