On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:40:05 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > gdcm 2.0.15 (currently in testing) introduced a regression compared to > gdcm 2.0.14 (a buffer overrun). > This would really help me if gdcm 2.0.16, which fixes this buffer > overrun would be accepted in squeeze. > Hrm. Was there no other way to fix that regression than a new upstream release with a diffstat that says: 177 files changed, 16453 insertions(+), 14716 deletions(-) ? Alternatively, is there a way I can review this without going crazy? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature