[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#594115: marked as done (RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing))



Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:53:13 +0200
with message-id <4C72EDC9.7000706@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#594115: RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing)
has caused the Debian Bug report #594115,
regarding RM: kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 (testing)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
594115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

We plan to only keep kfreebsd-8 in squeeze, to simplify maintenance
of the port, especially on the security side. However we would like
to keep kfreebsd-7 in unstable only for regression testing.

Would it be possible to remove kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 from testing?

Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: kFreeBSD 8.1-1-amd64
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 08/23/2010 09:29 PM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:

> We plan to only keep kfreebsd-8 in squeeze, to simplify maintenance
> of the port, especially on the security side. However we would like
> to keep kfreebsd-7 in unstable only for regression testing.
> 
> Would it be possible to remove kfreebsd-7/7.3-7 from testing?

Removal hint added.

Cheers

Luk


--- End Message ---

Reply to: