[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#594098: marked as done (unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2)



Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:23:45 +0100
with message-id <1282587825.20979.250.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#594098: unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #594098,
regarding unblock: darcs-buildpackage/0.5.12.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
594098: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594098
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

All the RC bugs seem fixed in darcs-buildpackage, but it doesn't
migrate. It's not clear to me what the problem is, maybe it needs
to be forced in somehow?

Cheers,
       Moritz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.ISO-8859-15@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:12 +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> All the RC bugs seem fixed in darcs-buildpackage, but it doesn't
> migrate. It's not clear to me what the problem is, maybe it needs
> to be forced in somehow?

The problem is that the 0.5.12 source is still in unstable, as newer
versions haven't been able to be built on hurd-i386 yet due to a chain
of unavailable build-dependencies.  (This is why the version graph on
the BTS page for #536922 shows "(unstable, stable)" in the lower red
oval)

In the longer term it would probably be helpful if the files provided to
britney by the BTS ignored such bugs.  In the short term, some
combination of a "force" hint and a removal request for the old
hurd-i386 binaries is required; I've done the former for now.

Regards,

Adam


--- End Message ---

Reply to: