On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:46:12PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, August 23, 2010 09:32, The Anarcat wrote:
> > I have just uploaded a new version of drush to unstable:
> >
> > http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/drush/news/20100822T173214Z.html
> >
> > This fixes a major usability issue due to a mis-packaging I originally
> > did (forgot to include a file) described in #588639.
> >
> > The full diff from 3.1-1 is attached. It does include some unrelated
> > changes (remove an extra licence file, fix a duplicate define, fix the
> > version control urls), so I am sorry for this, but unfortunately, those
> > fixes were sitting in my tree already, waiting for an upload.
>
> Your diff doesn't match the version of the package uploaded to unstable -
> specifically, the unstable package does not include the removal of the
> license file nor the change to includes/environment.inc.
apologies for that. I'm am not sure I understand what that implies. If
there are *less* changes than what is in the unstable upload, that
should be good, no? :)
The critical issue is just this patch to debian/rules:
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ install: build
cp -r $(CURDIR)/commands $(CURDIR)/includes $(CURDIR)/debian/drush/usr/share/drush
cp -r $(CURDIR)/drush.php $(CURDIR)/debian/drush/usr/share/drush/
+ cp -r $(CURDIR)/drush.info $(CURDIR)/debian/drush/usr/share/drush/
chmod a+x $(CURDIR)/debian/drush/usr/share/drush/drush.php
ln -s /usr/share/drush/drush.php $(CURDIR)/debian/drush/usr/bin/drush
I think that is in the unstable upload.
Thank you for your patience.. :)
--
Antoine Beaupré
Réseau Koumbit Networks
+1.514.387.6262
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature