[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: libvigraimpex: unplanned mini-transition?



On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:35:09 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:

> * Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 2010-07-28, 19:46:
> >>nmu lprof . ALL -alpha -kfreebsd-i386 -kfreebsd-amd64 . -m 'Rebuild against libvigraimpex2.'
> >>dw lprof . ALL -alpha -kfreebsd-i386 -kfreebsd-amd64 . -m 'libvigraimpex-dev (>= 1.7.0+dfsg-5)'
> >
> >Scheduled.
> 
> libvigraimpex is now a valid candidate, but apparently it needs
> manual hinting in order to be able to migrate to testing.
> 
Easy hint added, will hopefully go in tonight.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: