Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1

To: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org, Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>, 592616@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:56:37 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20100818145637.GR2988@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 201008181739.57611.danchev@spnet.net>
References: <[🔎] 20100811124224.23577.7768.reportbug@keel.southway-varna.com> <[🔎] 20100818133904.GO2988@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr> <[🔎] 20100818140122.GA23579@yavor.doganov.org> <[🔎] 201008181739.57611.danchev@spnet.net>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 17:39:57 +0300, George Danchev wrote:

> So, should we proceed with that package the way it is?
> 
I'd rather you didn't introduce that bug in stable (I'm no SRM though).

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
  - From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
  - From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
  - From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
  - From: George Danchev <danchev@spnet.net>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: SQLite3 in Squeeze
Next by Date: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
Next by thread: Re: Bug#592616: pu: package bgoffice/3.0-9+lenny1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread