On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 13:15:59 +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote: > > I'm a bit late with this but I didn't have the time and energy before my > vacation and some things came up very late. Do you think I can get the > following changes into squeeze (I haven't uploaded to unstable yet): > > > cvsd (1.0.19) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > * cvsd-buildroot: ignore commented out lines in CVSROOT/passwd files > * cvsd-buildroot: set an umask for generated files > * some documentation updates > * change init script dependency on $remote_fs (for /usr) from Should > to Required (thanks lintian) > * upgrade to standards-version 3.9.1 (no changes needed) > * switch to "3.0 (native)" format > I'd avoid the package format change if possible. The rest sounds fine. > These are not extremely critical but all are very minor changes and it > would be nice to get them fixed for the next stable release. The init > script change addresses a release goal. > I don't think it is really needed, because $remote_fs is always available so Should or Required are equivalent. But it certainly won't hurt. > nss-pam-ldapd (0.7.8) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > * minor portability improvements and cleanups (thanks Alexander V. > Chernikov and Ted C. Cheng) > * don't expand variables in rest of ${var:-rest} and ${var:+rest} > expressions if it is not needed (closes: #592320) > * libpam-ldapd.postinst: offer to add ldap to shadow in nsswitch.conf > if a potential broken configuration is found (closes: #592104) > * merge the suggests of libnss-ldapd and libpam-ldapd into those of > the nslcd package to have a single consistent list of PAM > alternatives for libnss-ldapd (closes: #591773) > * add libpam-sss as an alternative to libpam-ldapd (closes: #591773) > * upgrade to standards-version 3.9.1 (no changes needed) > > #592320 is minor but a very simple fix, #592104 is important and could > affect a number of users and may be hard to track down for users, > #591773 is important for Debian Edu and all other changes are very minor > and well tested. The change for #592104 will probably require another > upload with translation updates. > Seems ok. I'm not sure about modifying nsswitch.conf, but the devil is probably in the details. Please request translations early though, if not already done. > python-stdnum (0.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > * New upstream release: > - rename validate() function to is_valid() for all modules > - handle wrong types passed to is_valid() more gracefully > - add more tests and fix some minor bugs > > Neither of these is critical but I would rather not have python-stdnum > 0.1 in stable. This package is not important for stable, there are no > reverse dependencies yet and it is very new. Perhaps removing it from > squeeze is the best. > Will probably remove it, then. Thanks, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature