[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#592029: marked as done (nmu: jed_1:0.99.19-2)

Your message dated Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:24:35 -0400
with message-id <20100807002435.GK3096@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#592029: nmu: jed_1:0.99.19-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #592029,
regarding nmu: jed_1:0.99.19-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
592029: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=592029
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Owner: pkg-jed-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

The bug #575284 in ncurses made the built of jed failed. Hence, the
package has to be rebuild with the newer version.

nmu jed_1:0.99.19-2 . mips sparc . -m "Rebuild agains ncurses (>= 5.7+20100313-2); #574295"

Thanks, Jörg

-- System Information:
Debian Release: unstable/experimental
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, Aug  7, 2010 at 01:46:50 +0200, Jörg Sommer wrote:

> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> Owner: pkg-jed-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> The bug #575284 in ncurses made the built of jed failed. Hence, the
> package has to be rebuild with the newer version.
> 
Well, no.  If it was never built, it doesn't need to get rebuilt.

Anyway, given back.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: