Re: libvigraimpex: unplanned mini-transition?

["Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>]

On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:47 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>, 2010-07-22, 11:38:
> >>>It was discovered that VIGRA 1.7.0 (known as libvigraimpex in 
> >>>Debian), broke ABI without bumping SONAME.
[...]
> >>>3. Leave SONAME as is, but rename binary package from 
> >>>libvigraimpex2ldbl back to libvigraimpex2. (Binary package 
> >>>libvigraimpex2 did exist only before lenny release.)
> >>
> >>This seems the next most preferable option after 2), imho.
> 
> I have a new package (with the same SONAME, renamed binary package) 
> ready. Is it OK to upload it to unstable?

Yes, please go ahead.

> Note that one of the binary packages has dependency on "python-numpy 
> (>= 1.4)", which means that it will become entangled with another 
> unplanned transition.

Thanks for letting us know.

Regards,

Adam