Re: libvigraimpex: unplanned mini-transition?
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 11:47 +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>, 2010-07-22, 11:38:
> >>>It was discovered that VIGRA 1.7.0 (known as libvigraimpex in
> >>>Debian), broke ABI without bumping SONAME.
[...]
> >>>3. Leave SONAME as is, but rename binary package from
> >>>libvigraimpex2ldbl back to libvigraimpex2. (Binary package
> >>>libvigraimpex2 did exist only before lenny release.)
> >>
> >>This seems the next most preferable option after 2), imho.
>
> I have a new package (with the same SONAME, renamed binary package)
> ready. Is it OK to upload it to unstable?
Yes, please go ahead.
> Note that one of the binary packages has dependency on "python-numpy
> (>= 1.4)", which means that it will become entangled with another
> unplanned transition.
Thanks for letting us know.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: