Bug#587983: marked as done (nmu: hapm_0.7)
Your message dated Sun, 4 Jul 2010 10:49:58 -0300
with message-id <AANLkTinaZotpE9bXoQvTzmkzebBIFjHzp2Yl_NSErqx7@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#587983: nmu: hapm_0.7
has caused the Debian Bug report #587983,
regarding nmu: hapm_0.7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
587983: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587983
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Trying to solve a dependence rebuilding it to kfreebsd-i386 arch.
nmu hapm_0.7 . kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Trying to solve a dependence."
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Ok Adam, I understood. I was trying understand the binNMU process and
I don't saw that the heartbeat is absent in kfreebsd yet.
Sorry for this inconvenient. I am closing this bug now.
Regards,
Eriberto
2010/7/4 Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2010-07-03 at 12:02 -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
>
> The only obvious problem I can see is that hapm depends on heartbeat,
> which isn't available on kfreebsd-*; that isn't fixable via a binNMU and
> would require sourceful changes to hapm (either to depend on an
> alternative package / solution on kfreebsd-* or to not build on those
> architectures if there isn't an alternative).
--- End Message ---
Reply to: