On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 14:55:28 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> There are no open bugs against blacs-mpi, scalapack, or mumps.
>
> Any ideas on why they're still not transitioning? Is there an old
> binary package blocking migration?
>
Looks that way.
mumps (- to 4.9.2.dfsg-4)
Maintainer: Adam C. Powell, IV
37 days old (needed 10 days)
out of date on armel: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
out of date on hppa: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
out of date on mips: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
out of date on sparc: libmumps-4.9.2, libmumps-dev, libmumps-seq-4.9.2, libmumps-seq-dev, mumps-test (from 4.9.2.dfsg-2)
Not considered
Cheers,
Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature