Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
On 18/05/2010 14:28, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 08:29 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez a écrit :
>>>> evolution-exchange
>>
>> this one FTBFS with an error I've not yet investigated:
>>
>>> Making all in addressbook
>>> make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/buildd/evolution-exchange-2.30.1/addressbook'
>>> /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -fPIC -module -avoid-version -no-undefined -o libebookbackendexchange.la -rpath libebookbackendexchange_la-e-book-backend-exchange.lo libebookbackendexchange_la-e-book-backend-exchange-factory.lo libebookbackendexchange_la-e-book-backend-gal.lo libebookbackendexchange_la-e-book-backend-db-cache.lo ../tools/libevolution-exchange-shared.la -pthread -ledataserverui-1.2 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -ledata-book-1.2 -lebook-1.2 -ledata-cal-1.2 -lecal-1.2 -lical -licalss -licalvcal -ledataserver-1.2 -ldbus-glib-1 -lxml2 -lgconf-2 -ldbus-1 -lpthread -legroupwise-1.2 -lsoup-2.4 -lgio-2.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lebackend-1.2 -lglib-2.0 -Wl,-R/usr/lib/evolution/2.30 -pthread -L/usr/lib/evolution/2.30 -leutil -lcamel-provider-1.2 -lunique-1.0 -lgtkhtml-editor -lgnomecanvas-2 -lcamel-
1.2 -ledataserver-1.2 -lsqlite3 -lnss3 -lnssutil3 -lsmime3 -lssl3 -lxml2 -lsoup-2.4 -lplds4 -lplc4 -lnspr4 -lpthread -ldl -lgtkhtml-3.14 -lenchant -lgconf-2 -lart_lgpl_2 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangocairo-1.0 -lcairo -lgio-2.0 -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -lpthread -L/usr/lib -ldb
>>> libtool: link: only absolute run-paths are allowed
>>> make[3]: *** [libebookbackendexchange.la] Error 1
>>
>> and I don't have a setup to test it, so I might let Josselin take a look
>> at it when he has time.
>
> My first guess would be to relibtoolize. I can have a deeper look, but
> not before next week.
Relibtoolizing doesn't help, so I guess it'll have to wait.
>
>>>> evolution-rss
>>
>> This one doesn't have a stable release at that point, and experimental
>> uses a git snapshot. I might use that one to upload to unstable, but I'm
>> not exactly sure it's a good idea.
>
> It’s not a problem. Upstream doesn’t release often and this is how we
> usually proceed. The upstream developer is kind enough to directly
> forward relevant patches downstream.
>
> Since this is a leaf package, we can remove it at any point before the
> release if it turns out to be unsuitable for squeeze.
Hmmh, ok, do you have a get-orig-source or something, or do you just run
a make dist in a git checkout?
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
Reply to: