Re: transition: proposal libpt2.6.5->libpt2.6.6 & libopal3.6.6->libopal3.6.7

[Eugen Dedu <Eugen.Dedu@pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr>]

On 10/05/10 12:06, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-05 at 09:58 +0200, Eugen Dedu wrote:
> > On 05/05/10 00:14, Mark Purcell wrote:
> > > On Saturday 24 April 2010 16:53:33 Eugen Dedu wrote:
> > > > I have asked upstream (Robert Jongbloed) to make a new release ptlib
> > > > 2.6.7 and opal 3.6.8 with a very important network fix.  As there is
> > > > about stable branches, there should be no regression, we will check it
> > > > anyway.  Could we wait for a week?
> > >
> > > Eugen,
> > >
> > > Any word on this upstream release?
> >
> > I have sent a second e-mail upstream...
>
> Has there been any response yet?
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.  This transition looks
> self-contained enough that we should be able to start it without
> interfering with other transitions.
>
> Do we know whether this will fix the opal FTBFS on hppa (#572384)?  If
> it doesn't then the transition will get stuck in unstable.

Hi,

News:
- I have fixed all the appropriate upstream bugs
- I have tested the branches and they are ok from my point of vue, so 
they can be packaged to a new release
- but before I am looking at the hppa failure
- as soon as I fix it, I will contact upstream to make the release, and 
package it in debian

It is very near, do not worry...

--
Eugen