Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions

To: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
Cc: debian-release <debian-release@lists.debian.org>, pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 06:24:45 +0100
Message-id: <1272950685.10171.10381.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
In-reply-to: <1272922856.5893.30.camel@tomoyo>
References: <1269777299.3847.145.camel@tomoyo> <05e3a46e7f3adeab1038c7ac170a6e01.squirrel@sheerkahn> <1272891066.12232.55.camel@odin.lan> <1272922856.5893.30.camel@tomoyo>

On Mon, 2010-05-03 at 23:40 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Only remaining are binNMUs for tracker and rhythmbox against
> libtotem-plparser17.

Scheduled.

Regards,

Adam

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
  - From: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
  - From: Sebastian Dröge <slomo@circular-chaos.org>
- Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
  - From: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: please rebuild igstk
Next by Date: Re: Transition status
Previous by thread: Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
Next by thread: Re: Decoupling GNOME 2.30 transitions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread