[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#575260: marked as done (RM: bash-completion-lib/1.3.1-2 -- RoQA; not in stable, RC buggy, not currently in development)



Your message dated Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:32:28 -0000
with message-id <cc1e829805a6e407f32ca5c26baa91a3.squirrel@adsl.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#575260: RM: bash-completion-lib/1.3.1-2 -- RoQA;  not in stable, RC buggy, not currently in development
has caused the Debian Bug report #575260,
regarding RM: bash-completion-lib/1.3.1-2 -- RoQA; not in stable, RC buggy, not currently in development
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
575260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=575260
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Severity: normal

Dear release team,
  I've been investigating the status of bash-completion-lib, which is currently
RC buggy and, more generally, not suitable for a release (e.g. total
lack of any documentation).

Additionally, and thanks to David Paleino (Cc-ed), I've checked with upstream
that bash-completion-lib, while not yet abandoned, is currently not being
developed and his upstream is contributing all his work on the more mainstream
bash-completion package.  Upstream plans to drop bash-completion-lib anyhow in
the future once the "load by need" feature will be part of
bash-completion. Considering that bash-completion-lib has never been part of a
stable release, that the maintainer has not replied to its RC bugs, and
comparing the popcon of bash-completion{,-lib}, I hereby request it to be
removed from testing.

In fact, I think it should be even removed from the archive completely, but I'd
like the maintainer (Cc-ed as well) to voice his opinion on that more drastic
measure.

Cheers.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-3-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=it_IT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Wed, March 24, 2010 15:34, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>  I've been investigating the status of bash-completion-lib, which is
> currently RC buggy and, more generally, not suitable for a release (e.g.
> total lack of any documentation).
[...]
> Considering that bash-completion-lib has never been part
> of a stable release, that the maintainer has not replied to its RC bugs,
and
> comparing the popcon of bash-completion{,-lib}, I hereby request it to be
> removed from testing.

Removal hint added.

Regards,

Adam



--- End Message ---

Reply to: