--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi!
On #564123 we saw that imagemagick upstream did some incompatible ABI changes,
without updating the SONAME version.
They did change it later and we have an updated package available on
experimental.
A simple binNMU of the affected packages should be enough.
The first two messages asking for permission to upload to unstable can be seen
at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/01/msg00117.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/03/msg00092.html
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.33.naoliv1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 17:36 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> > On #564123 we saw that imagemagick upstream did some incompatible ABI
> > changes, without updating the SONAME version.
> > They did change it later and we have an updated package available on
> > experimental.
> >
> > A simple binNMU of the affected packages should be enough.
>
> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable; we'll then schedule the
> binNMUs.
As of the britney run which just finished:
imagemagick | 7:6.6.0.4-2 | testing | source, amd64, armel, hppa, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
imagemagick | 7:6.6.0.4-2 | unstable | source, alpha, amd64, armel, hppa, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
A couple of packages which weren't ready got removed from testing in the
process, but they should be able to go back in once they're ready.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---