On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 01:24:51 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote: > Hi, > > The xmms2 packagers team (or at least me and some xmms2 devolopers) like > to see xmms2 0.7DrNo in squeeze. The transition is blocked by a FTBFS on > hppa [1] and a segmentation fault of gcc on armel. Both issues are not > xmms2's fault. > However that doesn't prevent the xmms2 maintainers from working on them, or trying to work around them in xmms2. Is the armel FTBFS reproducible with -O0? Have you tried coming up with a small testcase and reporting the bug to gcc upstream? Have you tried investigating and working around the waf hppa fail? Cheers, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature