[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#573175: marked as done (hint: libqalculate/0.9.7-1)

Your message dated Tue, 9 Mar 2010 16:41:24 -0000
with message-id <451DF597E2E3429EBD55B4CE4DE0EA42@internal.avcosystems.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#573175: hint: libqalculate/0.9.7-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #573175,
regarding hint: libqalculate/0.9.7-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
573175: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=573175
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

libqalculate-dev reverse build-depends are qalculate-gtk, qalculate-kde and step
and they all have been built against libqalculate5. I guess libqalculate can go
into testing.

hint libqalculate/0.9.7-1

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-2-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

Vincent Legout wrote:

libqalculate-dev reverse build-depends are qalculate-gtk,
qalculate-kde and step and they all have been built against
libqalculate5. I guess libqalculate can go into testing.

hint libqalculate/0.9.7-1
I already had an "easy" hint in place for most of the packages, but managed to miss the kdeedu (for step) binNMUs. I've added them to the hint. 

Regards,
Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: