Bug#572899: marked as done (Another armel give-back)
Your message dated Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:35:32 +0000
with message-id <1267994132.4403.4727.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#572899: Another armel give-back
has caused the Debian Bug report #572899,
regarding Another armel give-back
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
572899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
these packages were tried against broken version:
dw haskelldb-hdbc_0.13-1 . -m "libghc6-hdbc-dev (>> 2.2.3-1), libghc6-convertible-dev (>> 1.0.9-1)"
I hope the broken versions will soon be all rebuilt, so that this
does not happen any more...
Thanks,
Joachim
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkuTwb4ACgkQ9ijrk0dDIGwLuACfUnNyjP96vvNPSf7C4ZAtM5lc
OKgAn05ZfxqAmrmjCEEbiLKTccsaM8xw
=tXjg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2010-03-07 at 16:09 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> these packages were tried against broken version:
>
> dw haskelldb-hdbc_0.13-1 . -m "libghc6-hdbc-dev (>> 2.2.3-1), libghc6-convertible-dev (>> 1.0.9-1)"
Done (after adding a ". armel" ;-).
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: