Processed: Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found

To: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
Cc: Debian Release Team <debian-release@lists.debian.org> (release.debian.org for {571435}), Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org> (src:matita for {571435})
Subject: Processed: Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found
From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:51:09 +0000
Message-id: <handler.s.C.126710938010976.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <4B868DFF.3020800@dogguy.org>
References: <4B868DFF.3020800@dogguy.org>

Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 571435 release.debian.org
Bug #571435 [src:matita] inconsistent assumptions over implementation GdomeInit
Bug reassigned from package 'src:matita' to 'release.debian.org'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions matita/0.5.8-2.
> retitle 571435 BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches
Bug #571435 [release.debian.org] inconsistent assumptions over implementation GdomeInit
Changed Bug title to 'BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches' from 'inconsistent assumptions over implementation GdomeInit'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found
  - From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found
Next by Date: Bug#571435: marked as done (BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches)
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#571435: matita: FTBFS: /bin/sh: query: not found
Next by thread: Bug#571435: marked as done (BinNMU lablgtkmathview and matita on all arches)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread