Hi all On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 08:19:03PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100: > > >On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > >> Just a gently polling. > > >> > > >> Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python > > >transition > has > > >> major priority... > > > > > >What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be > > >requested? (@RMs) > > > > binNMUs were scheduled earlier today. > > > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and > > the follow-up. > > > > Note that octave is not the only build-rdep. If you prefer so, I would > fill in a complete set of binNMU snippets updated to today. Sorry for my 'unclear' question. This was indeed that what I wanted to ask, if each maintainer is asked to to a separate binNMU request, or if it will be done in 'a row'. Thanks Franceso, if you will do it! Bests Salvatore
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature