Re: [firstname.lastname@example.org: Re: HDF5 migration to 1.8.4]
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:45:36PM -0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote, Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:30:41 +0100:
>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 09:25:00AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
>> > Just a gently polling.
>> > Most of the packages still need a rebuild, but maybe python
>> transition > has
>> > major priority...
>> What is the status about this? Should individual binNMU be requested?
> binNMUs were scheduled earlier today.
> See http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/02/msg00234.html and the
That's not enough. I only looked for octave-related packages that didn't
have hdf5 as build-dependencies (hdf5 is pulled in by Octave).
Sorry, but I didn't want to touch other maintainer's ground.