[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#569168: marked as done (Please rebuild fatrat against new gloox)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:42:33 +0000
with message-id <1265830953.14608.390.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#569168: Please rebuild fatrat against new gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #569168,
regarding Please rebuild fatrat against new gloox
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
569168: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Subject: nmu: fatrat_1.1.1-5
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Severity: normal

nmu fatrat_1.1.1-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild with new gloox"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.33-rc5 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

-- 
If you shed tears when you miss the sun, you also miss the stars.
- Rabindranath Tagore (Stray Birds, 1916)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 10:02 -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:42:37PM +0100, Cristian Greco wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:06:16 -0600
> > Kumar Appaiah <a.kumar@alumni.iitm.ac.in> wrote:
> > > nmu fatrat_1.1.1-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild with new gloox"
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > this binnmu would cause a FTBFS because fatrat currently doesn't support gloox
> > 1.0.x. I'm already in contact with upstream, a new fixed version should be
> > released soon.
> 
> Drat; I rebuilt with an incorrect chroot, it appears, which used the
> old gloox.
> 
> Apologies, and thanks for pointing this out, Cristian.

In which case, closing the bug with this message.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: