[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#567459: marked as done (experimental haskell binNMUs)

Your message dated Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:12:57 +0100
with message-id <87wrymr1ra.fsf@solon.marcbrockschmidt.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#567459: experimental haskell binNMUs
has caused the Debian Bug report #567459,
regarding experimental haskell binNMUs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
567459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567459
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I uploaded two haskell library packages to experimental, together with a
new version of haskell-devscripts, which depends on the new ghc6
compiler present in experimental. Two arches have started to build the
library in experimental using the old compiler, probably before the
upload of haskell-devscripts took full effect. Please re-build them,
after verifying that I used the correct syntax to make it an
experimental binNMU. The dw should not really be necessary, but it does
not hurt either:

nmu haskell-mtl_1.1.0.2-8 . amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Rebuild with latest haskell-devscripts" -d experimental
dw haskell-mtl_1.1.0.2-8 . amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m "haskell-devscripts (>= 0.6.19)" -d experimental

Thanks,
Joachim

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAktimpYACgkQ9ijrk0dDIGyz9gCgjVTlxdV1x3qx9Y1Gt6zLSjnr
2W0AnAhoUZ0CKiJfxwnKOLYaY/YKjJOg
=QF7D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> writes:
> I uploaded two haskell library packages to experimental, together with a
> new version of haskell-devscripts, which depends on the new ghc6
> compiler present in experimental. Two arches have started to build the
> library in experimental using the old compiler, probably before the
> upload of haskell-devscripts took full effect. Please re-build them,
> after verifying that I used the correct syntax to make it an
> experimental binNMU. The dw should not really be necessary, but it does
> not hurt either:
>
> nmu haskell-mtl_1.1.0.2-8 . amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m "Rebuild with latest haskell-devscripts" -d experimental
> dw haskell-mtl_1.1.0.2-8 . amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m "haskell-devscripts (>= 0.6.19)" -d experimental

Correct syntax, scheduled.

Marc
-- 
BOFH #275:
Bit rot

Attachment: pgpLOsUzwtf32.pgp
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: