On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 07:21:03PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > + * Another round of updates concerning new source formats: > + - fix dpkg-source to not complain on binary files that are ignored and are > + not going to be included in the debian tarball of a "3.0 (quilt)" source > + package. Closes: #524375 > + - let dpkg-source fail if several upstream orig.tar files are > + available (using different compression scheme) since we don't know > + which one to use. > + - before accepting to build a 3.0 (quilt) source packages, ensure that > + debian/patches is a directory (or non-existing) and that > + debian/patches/series is a file (or non-existing). Closes: #557618 > + - modify implementation of "3.0 (quilt)" source format to not be > + behave differently depending on whether quilt is installed or not. > + The option --without-quilt is thus gone and dpkg-source creates and > + relies on the .pc directory to know whether patches are applied or > + not. Closes: #557667 So the removal of --without-quilt is no problem because it only causes dpkg to emit a warning about an unknown option. That's good. I wonder if we are really, really sure that nobody relies on .dpkg-source-applied. I would hope that nobody assumed that to be an interface for something (e.g. to read a patch list from)? Kind regards, Philipp Kern -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:phil@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `- finger pkern/key@db.debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature