Bug#561310: marked as done (nmu: xml-security-c_1.5.1-2)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:35:19 +0000
with message-id <1261002919.4485.2648.camel@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#561310: nmu: xml-security-c_1.5.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #561310,
regarding nmu: xml-security-c_1.5.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
561310: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561310
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello folks,
Xerces-C 3.1 was recently uploaded, and Xerces-C changes its namespace
with each release. This means that libraries built against 3.0 cannot
be mixed with libraries built with 3.1. I uncovered this when preparing
to upload a new xmltooling package built against 3.1, which resulted in
missing symbols from xml-security-c since it was built against 3.0.
Could you rebuild xml-security-c against Xerces-C 3.1? I'll then be
uploading new versions of all of the packages that depend on xml-security-c
(namely the Shibboleth stack), since they all have new upstream releases
anyway.
nmu xml-security-c_1.5.1-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against Xerces-C 3.1."
Thanks!
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 17:45 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Could you rebuild xml-security-c against Xerces-C 3.1? I'll then be
> uploading new versions of all of the packages that depend on xml-security-c
> (namely the Shibboleth stack), since they all have new upstream releases
> anyway.
>
> nmu xml-security-c_1.5.1-2 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against Xerces-C 3.1."
These have been scheduled, so closing this bug.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: