[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#559242: marked as done (nmu: mozart-stdlib_20060615-4)



Your message dated Thu, 03 Dec 2009 07:46:35 +0100
with message-id <4B175ECB.2040105@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#559242: nmu: mozart-stdlib_20060615-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #559242,
regarding nmu: mozart-stdlib_20060615-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
559242: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=559242
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu


nmu mozart-stdlib_20060615-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against mozart 1.4.0
for compatible bytecode (closes: 559187)"


This nmu will close bug#559187, not sure if you can / do offer that service too.

thanks
k


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Kevin Glynn wrote:
> nmu mozart-stdlib_20060615-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against mozart 1.4.0
> for compatible bytecode (closes: 559187)"

Architecture: all packages can currently not be binNMUed, they will need
a sourceful upload, so closing this bug.

> This nmu will close bug#559187, not sure if you can / do offer that service too.

bugs will only be closed by sourceful uploads, though if the binNMU
would have been scheduled, I would probably close it manually.

Cheers

Luk


--- End Message ---

Reply to: