Luk Claes wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Hi, >> >> libxklavier and libgnomekbd need a transition. I uploaded them to experimental a >> few days ago, and uploaded most of the rdeps too. I would like to upload them to >> unstable now to start the transition. >> >> The build-rdeps of the packages are: >> >> emilio@saturno:~$ build-rdeps libxklavier12-dev >> Reverse Build-depends in main: >> ------------------------------ >> >> gnome-settings-daemon >> xfkc >> xfce4-xkb-plugin >> xfce4-settings >> kdebase-workspace >> glunarclock >> control-center >> libgnomekbd >> gnome-applets >> >> Found a total of 9 reverse build-depend(s) for libxklavier12-dev. >> >> >> emilio@saturno:~$ build-rdeps libgnomekbd-dev >> Reverse Build-depends in main: >> ------------------------------ >> >> gnome-settings-daemon >> gnome-screensaver >> control-center >> gnome-applets >> >> Found a total of 4 reverse build-depend(s) for libgnomekbd-dev. >> >> >> As you can see, the libgnomekbd-dev transition only adds itself and >> gnome-screensaver to the list of packages, so it wouldn't be a big deal to >> transition them together. >> >> I can upload all of them, except xfce4-xkb-plugin, xfce4-settings and xfkc >> (which will be done by Yves-Alexis), kdebase-workspace (only needs to change the >> build-dependency, the code has an #if #else to build with both APIs), and >> glunarclock (seems unnecessary, but in any case a rebuild should be enough). >> >> Should I let libxklavier-dev provide libxklavier12-dev for those packages that >> will be fine with a binNMU? I'm not sure that's a good idea since the number of >> packages that would benefit is too few (3 or 4) and we want them to use >> libxklavier-dev for the next time the SONAME changes. We could remove the >> provides in the future though. >> >> What do you think? Can I start these two transitions together? If so, when is OK >> to do so? > > Yes, it's ok. Please do it now. All done, the last one to be uploaded was glunarclock which is 6 days old now. Let me know if there's anything else I should do. Cheers, Emilio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature