[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#548642: transition: liblo



On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 17:40 -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 16:29 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> > this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> > liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> > However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> > liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> > NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> > should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
> > with the old one.
> 
> Ping?

Again? Someone in here?


-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: