serveez: proposed update for stable and oldstable
I've prepared a fix for a buffer overflow in serveez (Bug#540657), which
affects both etch and lenny (the package is not in unstable or testing
anymore), and have mailed the security team about it. I was told by Nico
Golde:
Given the rather low count of serveez installations (4) and that this
is only one of the functional parts of serveez I propose to update
this via stable-proposed-updates. I think this doesn't deserve a DSA.
I've attached the debdiffs for etch and lenny (which are pretty much
identical):
diff -u serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog
--- serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog
+++ serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+serveez (0.1.5-2+etch1) oldstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Applied patch to fix HTTP remote buffer overflow (closes: #540657).
+
+ -- Andreas Rottmann <rotty@debian.org> Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:18:33 +0200
+
serveez (0.1.5-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Added cdbs to Build-Depends (closes: #198091).
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- serveez-0.1.5.orig/src/http-server/http-core.c
+++ serveez-0.1.5/src/http-server/http-core.c
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@
break;
/* RFC850-Date */
default:
- sscanf (date, "%s, %02d-%3s-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d GMT",
+ sscanf (date, "%9s, %02d-%3s-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d GMT",
_wkday, &parse_time.tm_mday, _month, &parse_time.tm_year,
&parse_time.tm_hour, &parse_time.tm_min, &parse_time.tm_sec);
diff -u serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog
--- serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog
+++ serveez-0.1.5/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+serveez (0.1.5-2.1+lenny1) stable; urgency=high
+
+ * Applied patch to fix HTTP remote buffer overflow (closes: #540657).
+
+ -- Andreas Rottmann <rotty@debian.org> Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:09:52 +0200
+
serveez (0.1.5-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
* Non-maintainer upload.
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- serveez-0.1.5.orig/src/http-server/http-core.c
+++ serveez-0.1.5/src/http-server/http-core.c
@@ -773,7 +773,7 @@
break;
/* RFC850-Date */
default:
- sscanf (date, "%s, %02d-%3s-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d GMT",
+ sscanf (date, "%9s, %02d-%3s-%02d %02d:%02d:%02d GMT",
_wkday, &parse_time.tm_mday, _month, &parse_time.tm_year,
&parse_time.tm_hour, &parse_time.tm_min, &parse_time.tm_sec);
Regards, Rotty
--
Andreas Rottmann -- <http://rotty.yi.org/>
Reply to: