also sprach Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> [2009.08.03.1047 +0200]: > > In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this > > point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state > > the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide > > security upgrades for squeeze). > > Oh, did they? That was just one possible outcome/example. > > Hope this helps, > > I dont think so. You made it sound as if Debian would follow > Ubuntu or Marks wishes, and that Ubuntu/Canonical has committed to > support Debian. AFAIK, we dont and they dont. I phrased it badly then. It's exactly points like this which need to be addressed explicitly: why are we doing this? And iff Canonical/Ubuntu is part of the reason, then state exactly where the benefits for Debian are, and ideally how this decision was reached in the first place. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects: : :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems "a fundamentalist is someone who hates sin more than he loves virtue." -- john h. schaar
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)