Le samedi 24 octobre 2009 à 14:10 +0200, Daniel Leidert a écrit : > I'm in favour of finally dropping the libtool .la file in the > libexpat1-dev package. This has already been done in the past, but > reverted [1] for Lenny. I'm currently preparing an update of the package > and I would like to drop this file. But this might require a bunch of > binNMUs. I did not yet check, which packages are affected (usually only > those shipping a libtool .la file themself). I will attach a list of > packages ASAP. > > Are you ok with this? Personally, I am not. Didn’t we have enough with libogg? You need to ask maintainers of reverse-dependencies to drop their dependency_libs line instead. Cheers, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette : :' : `. `' “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in `- future understand things” -- Jörg Schilling
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=