[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#552065: marked as done (release.debian.org: binNMU for r-cran-* packages for R 2.10.0)

Your message dated Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:37:06 +0200
with message-id <20091023073706.GA11034@kelgar.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#552065: release.debian.org: binNMU for r-cran-* packages for R 2.10.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #552065,
regarding release.debian.org: binNMU for r-cran-* packages for R 2.10.0
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
552065: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552065
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Le Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 01:29:21PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
>
> R 2.10.0, due out October 26, will switch to an internal html converter from
> the latex-alike Rd format coupled with an internal webserver.  See below for
> the section on 'Significant user-visible changes' in the NEWS file from
> 2.10.0 -- taken from the Oct 13 beta currently in unstable.
>
> This means we "should" rebuild all packages or else they will upon load
> trigger a nagging message 'package foo was built under R version x.y.z and
> may not function properly' as well as possible malfunctions of the help
> system.  As we're only talking 100+ packages, this should work.

Dear release team,

we are in the course of rebuilding the CRAN Arch:all packages against
the beta of R 2.10.0, that Dirk already uploaded to Unstable.

Could you binNMU the following Arch: any packages? That would be a great help.

nmu r-cran-epibasix_1.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
nmu r-other-mott-happy_2.1-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
nmu r-cran-colorspace_1.0.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
nmu r-cran-msm_0.9.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
nmu r-cran-sp_0.9.36-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
nmu r-cran-spc_0.21-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'

Have a nice day,

--
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:42:02PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> nmu r-cran-epibasix_1.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
> nmu r-other-mott-happy_2.1-4 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
> nmu r-cran-colorspace_1.0.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
> nmu r-cran-msm_0.9.3-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
> nmu r-cran-sp_0.9.36-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'
> nmu r-cran-spc_0.21-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuilt against 2.10.0 (new documentation format).'

Done.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-- 
 .''`.  Philipp Kern                        Debian Developer
: :' :  http://philkern.de                         Stable Release Manager
`. `'   xmpp:phil@0x539.de                         Wanna-Build Admin
  `-    finger pkern/key@db.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: