Re: Bug#548126: pu: package opensaml2/2.0-2+lenny1
* Faidon Liambotis:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Right. Please upload opensaml2 first (after sending in a source
>> debdiff for review), and then wait with uploading shibboleth-sp2 until
>> we tell you it's okay to do so.
> OK, will do. How should we handle the fact that the newer xmltooling is
> breaking the "old" (as in, lenny) opensaml2/shibboleth-sp2?
We could theoretically add a Conflicts: to a new upload of xmltooling,
but this is unnecessary. We don't do this for every bug that stems
from the interaction of two packages.
> I don't think it can be solved with regular dpkg constructs (xmltooling
> is already present in security), would just mentioning it in the DSA be
> alright?
"apt-get upgrade" will do the right thing, so it's sufficient to
mention the issue in general, I think.
Reply to: