Re: libjack.la rdep issue
- To: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, jcorgan@corganenterprises.com, Corgan@gag.com, Johnathan@gag.com
- Subject: Re: libjack.la rdep issue
- From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 18:14:15 +0200
- Message-id: <20090901161415.GI19557@mails.so.argh.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>, debian-release@lists.debian.org, jcorgan@corganenterprises.com, Corgan@gag.com, Johnathan@gag.com
- In-reply-to: <20090901160546.GG19557@mails.so.argh.org>
- References: <20090901152542.47CEB14A00A@rover.gag.com> <20090901160546.GG19557@mails.so.argh.org>
* Andreas Barth (aba@not.so.argh.org) [090901 18:06]:
> * Bdale Garbee (bdale@gag.com) [090901 17:26]:
> > I can't build gnuradio because the jack maintainers have stopped providing
> > libjack.la and yet portaudio19-dev ships a .la file that has a reference to
> > it. I'm not a libtool expert, but conversation on #debian-devel on IRC
> > suggests that this means that either the jack folks need to reintroduce a
> > dummy libjack.la, or all the jack rdeps (like portaudio19) need to be
> > rebuilt to eliminate the reference.
>
> Correct. I'll schedule some binNMUs now.
Another question: Are you preparing another upload of gnuradio, or
should I just give-back gnuradio on all architecture where it failed
in another week or so?
Cheers,
Andi
Reply to: